JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 19, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Luis Alejandro Medina Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Recusacion Formulada Contra El Magistrado Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra Para Conocer De Las Demandas Contra El Acto Legislativo 02 De 2004. El Hecho Invocado Como Causal, La Edad Del Referido Magistrado, No Encuadra Bajo Ninguno De Los Supuestos Facticos Descritos En Los Articulos 25 Y 26 Del Decreto 2067 De 1991. Los Demandantes Carecen De Legitimación Para Promover La Recusacion. Se Declara La Carencia De Legitimación Y La Impertinencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar que los ciudadanos Luis Alejandro Medina y Marcelo Torres carecen de legitimacion para promover la recusacion de la referencia contra el Magistrado Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra, la cual se declara en cualquier caso impertinente.
  2. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.